General Discussion
|
Subject: measurements
|
|
|
|
From
|
Location
|
Message
|
Date Posted
|
| n8wzq |
Mid Michigan
|
Ok guys.......I admit it, i have brainfarts every now and then. I'm confused about how these pumpkins are measured. When Kirby was small, i would lift gently, and measure around it...from bottom to top for circumference, then i read that you measure around the pumpkin from stem end to blossom end for circumference.....what a releif not to have to pick him up anymore. Now......the "ott" measurement, Is that circumference ( at the biggest point around the pumpkin, stem to blossom end), and then over the top from stem to blossom, and then over the top from ground, to ground? I'm getting 64 inches in circumference at the biggest point around the middle from stem end to blossom end, and that equates to about 70 lbs. When i add up the other 3 measurements i mentioned above, it only comes out to 40 lbs on the estimation chart. Which is the correct way to do it? Thanks....a way confused "cuzbiker"
|
8/1/2001 9:48:46 AM
|
| gordon |
Utah
|
you have circ right. - biggest point around from stem end to blossom end - parallel to the ground
next is ground to ground over the top from stem side to blossom side - some people say over the top front to back
last is ground to ground over the top from side to side - ie 90 degrees from the front to back measurement
for an illustration see: http://www.backyardgardener.com/weight.html
good luck gordon
ps- picking up your fruit is a no no - you might damage them - last year i put a finger nail scratch into on accidentally when it was a couple of weeks old. really small - like 1/2 long and the same width as a finger nail. at the end of the season the scar was about 4 inches long and 1/2 inch wide. the pumpkin was 520 lbs.
|
8/1/2001 10:22:54 AM
|
| Bruiser |
Herndon, VA
|
Also take a look at the article about measuring pumpkins, by Len Stellpflug, in the How-To section of BigPumpkins.com. The circumference measurement no longer has to be parallel to the ground. --Bruiser
|
8/1/2001 12:10:15 PM
|
| n8wzq |
Mid Michigan
|
Ok......thanks guys. That clears up some of the confusion. At least i can know it's approximate weight the right way!! Cuzbiker
|
8/1/2001 12:28:54 PM
|
| Wes@PA |
Chester Co., PA
|
Don Langevin's GiantPumpkins.com site has charts also. Go to GiantPumpkins.com and click on estimating weight.
There is also a nice diagram showing how to do the measurements.
|
8/1/2001 12:36:29 PM
|
| LIpumpkin |
Long Island,New York
|
Cuz...those charts work well for an average pumpkin...if you get an overly long pumpkin the circ. chart will not be very accurate. An overly tall pumpkin will also be somewhat inaccurate.Example...my 550Andrews99=141circ with an ott of 291....if I went by circumference it would estimate out as 630lbs.The ott chart was a bit over 500. It was a long low and wide fruit.very big circumference but almost a flat pumpkin.....G
|
8/1/2001 5:02:50 PM
|
| hey you |
Greencastle, PA
|
how much did it way?
|
8/1/2001 7:55:54 PM
|
| Joze (Joe Ailts) |
Deer Park, WI
|
550 Andrews = 550lbs. Weird!
|
8/2/2001 9:17:08 AM
|
| gordon |
Utah
|
Brusier is right- it doesn't have to be parrallel to the ground. but was the best way i could think of to discribe it. anyway- glad you got it straightened out. ALSO.... I have an excel file that you can track your pumpkins estimated weight with. you put in the 3 OTT numbers and it gives you the estimated weight using the OTT formula, it also gives you the daily weight gain, a graph of daily weight gain, plus a graph of the total weight. if any one is interested just email me and i'll email it back to you. it comes in a daily or weekly format also english or metric units is available. email me at [email protected] and tell me what version you want.
gordon maple valley wa
ps- i have tomorrow off and i the program is on my PC at work requests might not be filled till next week.
|
8/2/2001 10:38:44 AM
|
| gordon |
Utah
|
just to clarify- the offer for the excel program is open to anyone.
|
8/2/2001 10:44:40 AM
|
| Gary(2) |
Kennett Square, PA
|
With all due respect to my esteemed colleagues. I fear too many measurements as it is not IF but when you start bending or breaking foliage that offers wonderful shade to your extended family (pumpkins for you in the hills of W.V.) Don Langevin offers a measuring tape that requires only 1 measurement (blossom to stem) and has the estimated weight right below the "'s. I've found this to be within 10 pounds of other excel type formulas that typically require 3 measurements. My concern is always beating a path to the plant, stepping on a vine or creating an access for animals after hours from the scent we all leave from visiting the 'fruits of our labor'. Gary Liska Kennett Square, PA
|
8/2/2001 11:16:58 PM
|
| Total Posts: 11 |
Current Server Time: 5/6/2026 2:13:14 PM |