General Discussion
|
Subject: Why are heavy genetics so desireable?
|
|
|
|
From
|
Location
|
Message
|
Date Posted
|
| Doug14 |
Minnesota([email protected])
|
I see that heavy seed genetics(those seeds that tend produce pumpkins that weigh more than the OTT est.) seem to be the rage with growers. I would like to know the reasons why? Are we just assuming this is better, or do we have concrete reasons to seek heavy genetics? I don't know if less chance of splitting can be a valid arguement. I've heard the 1260 Weir described as a splitter. Haven't some the largest pumpkins each year weighed close to the chart? Are we just growing heavy genetics because they can give us a pleasant surprise at weighoff time? I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Doug
|
1/3/2005 2:14:47 PM
|
| Engel's Great Pumpkins and Carvings |
Menomonie, WI ([email protected])
|
As I have been told a million times Doug we aint in no beauty contest here. Heaviest pumpkin wins the prize money, plain and simple.
|
1/3/2005 2:31:38 PM
|
| Andy W |
Western NY
|
- i like the pleasant suprise at the weighoff
- makes for a better carving/sculpture
- suprises the competition
i don't think that the heavier ones are any less likely to split from my own observations, although i don't have any larger scale data to prove anything. if anything, the thicker ones might give you a slight advantage in time to total destruction if a rot begins to develop.
|
1/3/2005 3:27:14 PM
|
| Doug14 |
Minnesota([email protected])
|
Shannon, The heaviest pumpkin could come from a pumpkin that weighs light to the charts. It will look more massive as well, due to a greater OTT measurement.
|
1/3/2005 4:20:37 PM
|
| Engel's Great Pumpkins and Carvings |
Menomonie, WI ([email protected])
|
If you have 6 plants and your 4 biggest tape out around the same size. Which one are you going to put on the trailer when you can only bring one?
|
1/3/2005 4:23:38 PM
|
| floh |
Cologne / Germany
|
I think more growers look for orange, round AND heavy right now and that´s the way it should be. I can´t see any reason not to look for a beauty LOL there should be a development to increase all that at the same time like many 2004 crosses 1000+ already did.
|
1/3/2005 4:26:46 PM
|
| hey you |
Greencastle, PA
|
honestly, i don't think a 1500lb fruit could be supported by a thin walled fruit. common sense tells me that a thicker, denser fruit would be more structurally sound. it's also really nice when a fruit goes heavier than you thought it would. just my 2.36 cents. tOM
|
1/3/2005 5:20:55 PM
|
| Tom B |
Indiana
|
thats easy shannon, weigh them all first...LOL
Tom
|
1/3/2005 6:40:32 PM
|
| Tremor |
[email protected]
|
Good call Tom.
Heavy to the chart does instill confidence in wall thickness & strength. But other than that the whole thing is highly over rated. One slip of the tape & no one wants to grow the seeds for fear the things might throw light fruit. LOL
|
1/3/2005 6:54:31 PM
|
| MNPG(Al) |
Mn
|
I just like big mean pumpkins that go OTC. I also like the pretty ones too. And i really really like the pretty ones that go way heavy (ex. 1370 rose). I also believe that the thicker the walls the more structurally sound the pumpkin is.
|
1/3/2005 10:38:39 PM
|
| Brooks B |
Ohio
|
just let Jack Larue grow it, it wont split.
|
1/4/2005 8:13:58 AM
|
| Ron H |
Riverton, WY
|
Or how about this .... a 1500 lb pumpkin that is 30% heavy might fit in the back of your pickup, but a 1500 lb pumpkin that's 30% light might not?? lol
|
1/6/2005 8:23:23 AM
|
| Total Posts: 12 |
Current Server Time: 4/30/2026 4:41:28 PM |